Even though I did not attend the swg on Monday after speaking with them this what they talked about and what we decided , we felt very strong about the draft we submitted. The student sample, research, and observation notes definitely helped us put all of our perspectives together into one joint effort. Everyone worked well together despite our original scheduling concerns. Although our observations were mainly Landon’s idea, everyone agreed and found time to attend each event as a group. We all found the essay to be an interesting piece of work that allowed us to discover why musicians act and think the way the do.
During small writing groups, we received feedback from both professors and the in class writing groups. We all felt the feedback was positive and will help us shape and clean the paper to our liking. The biggest revision will be to further explain each observation and how we conducted them. Although both concerts are self explanatory, the survey interviews with staff, and the tour of the DART Lab could be explained in the paper a little better.
Landon went around Transy’s campus (going to friends first, then walking around public areas like the Beck Center and the Campus Center) and surveyed 100 students, professors, and employees. This verbal survey was conducted on 10/19/26. The survey consisted of the following questions: 1.) Do you listen to music? 2.) What music do you listen to? 3.) Do have a personal connection with this type of music? The results of this this survey were that 98 of the 100 listened to music, the top genres of music were country and rap, and 98 of the 100 had a personal connection with style of music. This proves that both musicians and non musicians have a connection/listen to music. Our job now is to explain this more in depth in our paper.
The interviews we conducted were left out by mistake. Our interviews were with Choral Director Brittany Benningfield and Dr. Polashek of the Music Technology Program. We will explain the interviews in our revision process and signify why they are important to support aspects of a musician’s subculture. Theses interviews will be used to support an observation (made by any of our group members) about a musician’s subculture rather than using them as their own paragraph.
Last but most definitely not least, the tour of the DART Lab. We will further explain our tour of the DART Lab by giving the reader more details about our experience. We were shown the equipment within the lab, given a tour of a standard workstation, shown inside the sound booths, and a brief introduction to a recording software called pro tools. Although this is not directly related to all musician’s subculture, it is important for professional artists in terms of the business, industry, and recording/studio process of a musician’s subculture